Emphasizing the assignment of the…

61e53190bc9cc80001b0b448

Emphasizing the assignment of the court to encourage the resolution of sincere matrimonial disputes, the Supreme Court set aside confidence in a man under the part of 498a from the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’). In this case, the husband was punished under the section 498-A IPC and was sentenced to serving a three-year simple […]

The Supreme Court of…

61ba9336c5a7f00001153287

The Supreme Court of India observed that the mechanical compliance of stipulations under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, does not prove the execution of a Will. Evidence of meeting the requirement of the said provision must be reliable, the bench of Justices L. Nageswara Rao and Aniruddha Bose said. In this case, […]

The Supreme Court reiterated that…

61ba8ff156a0ae0001bf7306

The Supreme Court reiterated that a rape accused can be convicted on sole testimony of prosecuterix if she is found to be credible and trustworthy. In this case, one of the contentions raised by the rape accused who was concurrently convicted under Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code was that the prosecution case rests […]

Sexual enhancement tablets meant to…

61b94158fca61a0001ac49fa

Sexual enhancement tablets meant to enhance male potency do not attract the provisions of the NDPS Act, the Supreme Court observed while granting bail to NDPS Accused. In this case, the accused was granted bail by the Special Court on the ground that he was not found to be in possession of any psychotropic substance […]

Payment of extortion money does…

60715538ae4c24000145b9ae

Payment of extortion money does not amount to terror funding, the Supreme Court observed while granting bail to an accused arrested under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act [UAPA]. In this case, the bail application of Sudesh Kedia was dismissed by the High Court on a finding that he had been paying extortion money, and thus contributed […]

The Supreme Court observed that…

605e0d7845d38a0001dcd7fb

The Supreme Court observed that the statement made during a secret / open investigation at the Pre-FIR stage could not be said as a statement under the 160 CRPC and / or statement that will be recorded during an inquiry in accordance with the criminal procedure code and therefore cannot be used against Defendant during […]

RSS
Follow by Email
LinkedIn
Share
Instagram

Make an enquiry

Hi Chennai Law Forum | Best Advocates Legal Help 24/7,

I wanted to know about “Free Legal Consultation”
Please inform me on my below email address/mobile number.
Thanks.